15. Intervenciones preventivas para personas con riesgo ultraalto de psicosis: un metanálisis actualizado y ampliado
Abstract
Realizamos el comentario de un metaanálisis que tiene como principal objetivo el evaluar la eficacia de diferentes tratamientos y abordajes clínicos a la hora de prevenir la transición a psicosis de un grupo de pacientes en estado de ultra-alto riesgo para ello. En el mismo, analizaremos la metodología del estudio, sus resultados y conclusiones, así como la calidad del estudio y la revista donde se publicó.
We comment on a meta-analysis whose main objective is the evaluation of the effectiveness of different treatments and clinical approaches for transition prevention to psychosis in a group of ultra-high risk individuals. In the present study, we analyze the methodology of the study, its results and conclusions, as well as the quality of the article and the journal where it was published.
Citas
Mei, C., Van der Gaag, M., et al. Preventive interventions for individuals at ultra high risk for psychosis: An updated and extended meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review. 2021 March; doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102005.
Joa, I., Bjornestad, J., et al. Early detection of ultra high risk for psychosis in a Norwegian catchment area: The two year follow-up of the prevention of psychosis study. Front. Psychiatry. 2021, Feb;12: 573905. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.573905.
Worthington, M. A., Cannon, T. K., Prediction and prevention in the clinical high-risk for psychosis paradigm: A review of the current status and recommendations for future direction of inquiry. Front. Psychiatry. 2021, Oct;12:770774. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.770774.
McHugh, M. J., McGorry, P. D., et al. The ultra-hight-risk for psychosis groups: Evidence to maintain the status quo. Schizophr Res. 2017, Sept. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.09.003
MPG Journal - Política de privacidad